Author Topic: Problems checking the EQ573 II

March 21, 2023, 10:42:37 AM
Read 4615 times

PACO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Good morning Jean Pierre,

I have just to finish the EQ573II but I'm afraid there's something wrong with the assembly.

The checking figures are:

A -2,1V
B -14,6V
C -13,2V
D -11,1V
E -7,9V
F-5,6V
G  -0,7V
H -6,8V
I -13,2V
J -13,8V
K -7,9V
L -5,6V
M -6,1V
N -6,8V


I have to say that in the point A there's some sparks when I conect the O volts and the R48 resistor.

Could you guide me?

Thank you very much!

March 21, 2023, 05:45:48 PM
Reply #1

JPK

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1117
  • Karma: +37/-0
    • View Profile
I have to say that in the point A there's some sparks when I conect the O volts and the R48 resistor.
Normal, A is the positive supply rail for the circuit

Check V+ test pin (against 0V) : +16V
Check V- test pin (against 0V) : -16V
Check the solder joints of R48.
Check that R46 is still conducting.

JPK

March 21, 2023, 09:11:20 PM
Reply #2

PACO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
I have to say that in the point A there's some sparks when I conect the O volts and the R48 resistor.
Normal, A is the positive supply rail for the circuit

Check V+ test pin (against 0V) : +16V
Check V- test pin (against 0V) : -16V
Check the solder joints of R48.
Check that R46 is still conducting.

V- gives -16V but V+ is -0,7V
I have checked ans resolder R48 and R46 is not conducting

Should I replace R46 and R48?

Thanks Jean Pierre!


March 22, 2023, 09:49:22 AM
Reply #3

JPK

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1117
  • Karma: +37/-0
    • View Profile
Yes you should replace them.
They were probably destroyed when you created these sparks.
JPK

March 23, 2023, 05:03:58 PM
Reply #4

PACO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Yes you should replace them.
They were probably destroyed when you created these sparks.
Hi Jean Pierre,
I replace the resistors and finally every the parameters seems to go fine. (Except the point G, I'm not sure what resistor I have to measure)

*Read the second column, the first one was before the replacement.

A -2,1V    13,3V
B -14,6V  -13,3V
C -13,2V  -10,5V
D -13,8V  -11,1V
E -7,9V      -2,6V
F-5,6V        3,7V

H -6,8V      2,5V
I -13,2V  -10,5V
J -13,8V  -11,1V
K -7,9V      -2,6V
L -5,6V      3,7V
M -6,1V      3,1V
N -6,8V      2,5V

I have just to test it and I verify that the signal drops more than 20 dB in XLR Mode



« Last Edit: March 23, 2023, 06:56:13 PM by PACO »

March 24, 2023, 02:59:50 PM
Reply #5

JPK

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1117
  • Karma: +37/-0
    • View Profile
JPK

March 24, 2023, 05:37:09 PM
Reply #6

PACO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Looks good !
Trying to trace follow the signal (100Hz at 2VAC) the results are:

TP1 0.20 VAC
TP2 0.16 VAC
TP3 1.62 VAC

Are there normals numbers? in that case, I'm not sure why en XLR mode the signal drops more than 20dB

Many thanks, JP!!

March 25, 2023, 03:22:20 PM
Reply #7

JPK

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1117
  • Karma: +37/-0
    • View Profile
Not normal.
Do you also have an attenuation when the EQ is OFF ?
Check solder joints of R1 to R4, R10, R11, U1, U2.
JPK

March 26, 2023, 07:24:08 PM
Reply #8

PACO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Not normal.
Do you also have an attenuation when the EQ is OFF ?
Check solder joints of R1 to R4, R10, R11, U1, U2.
yes, the attenuation is always, even if the EQ is ON or OFF

I have checked the joints you told me but nothing changes

March 27, 2023, 03:44:29 PM
Reply #9

JPK

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1117
  • Karma: +37/-0
    • View Profile
When bypassed the signal path is really simple: U1 receiver followed by U driver.
Check that the relays are in the correct direction.
Check you didn't swap U1 & U2.
Did you do something that could have damaged U1 or U2?
JPK

March 27, 2023, 06:12:11 PM
Reply #10

PACO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
When bypassed the signal path is really simple: U1 receiver followed by U driver.
Check that the relays are in the correct direction.
Check you didn't swap U1 & U2.
Did you do something that could have damaged U1 or U2?
The relays are well installed and the amps also well.

I don´t know how to check how to test if they are working right

March 28, 2023, 12:24:10 PM
Reply #11

JPK

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1117
  • Karma: +37/-0
    • View Profile
In bypass (OFF) mode, you should get half of the input voltage on U1 pin1 and U2 pin4.
With 2VAC you should get 1VAC.
JPK

March 28, 2023, 05:30:14 PM
Reply #12

PACO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
In bypass (OFF) mode, you should get half of the input voltage on U1 pin1 and U2 pin4.
With 2VAC you should get 1VAC.
Hi again Jean Pierre,

Sorry for bothering you again, but this makes me mad.

The current situation is:

- In Pre Mode everything is OK. The EQ works fine with the MP576
- In XLR there's no return signal from the EQ to the DAW



So, I can't trace the signal.
I don't know if the solution is to change U1 and U2, check the reles or how to check. The only problem is that it seems that in XLR mode goes to bypass

March 28, 2023, 06:01:42 PM
Reply #13

PACO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
JP,

Forget the last poat. Everything seems to work 100%. The problem is the slot of the lunchbox!!

Thank you for four patience!

March 28, 2023, 06:05:40 PM
Reply #14

JPK

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1117
  • Karma: +37/-0
    • View Profile
Great, I was about to reply!
JPK

March 30, 2023, 01:32:51 PM
Reply #15

PACO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Great, I was about to reply!
I Jean Pierre,

Solving all the problems of before, now I'm testing the EQ.

The HP Filter, Low and mid Shelf seems to work properly, but I feel not with the High Shelf.

The shelving in 10K seems to be excessive (Look at the pic)



Same in the other frequencies.

Can be related with this abnormal results checking the signal?

TP1 0.20 VAC
TP2 0.16 VAC
TP3 1.62 VAC



March 30, 2023, 05:55:19 PM
Reply #16

JPK

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1117
  • Karma: +37/-0
    • View Profile
Is this with the high shelf pot at min?
It doesn't look that much different from this:


Can be related with this abnormal results checking the signal?
TP1 0.20 VAC
TP2 0.16 VAC
TP3 1.62 VAC



The values with the black PCB version are (for 2VAC at the input):
TP1: 1 VAC
TP2: 1 VAC
TP3: 0.9 VAC
TP4: 0.8 VAC

Your values seem to be wrong.
Do you have an attenuation when the EQ is OFF ? There should not be any.
JPK

March 30, 2023, 06:50:00 PM
Reply #17

PACO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Correct! It’s at minimum. Is it normal to start to attenuate at 2K?

This numbers are with 2VAC. There’s no signal attenuation in bypass

March 31, 2023, 04:02:31 PM
Reply #18

JPK

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1117
  • Karma: +37/-0
    • View Profile
Is it normal to start to attenuate at 2K?
Yes, normal.

Do you confirm TP1 0.20 VAC instead of 1VAC?
What is the AC voltage on U1 pin1? It should be the same as TP1.
And what is the AC voltage on U1 pin1 in bypass?
JPK

March 31, 2023, 07:19:30 PM
Reply #19

PACO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Is it normal to start to attenuate at 2K?
Yes, normal.

Do you confirm TP1 0.20 VAC instead of 1VAC?
What is the AC voltage on U1 pin1? It should be the same as TP1.
And what is the AC voltage on U1 pin1 in bypass?
Yes, TP1 is 0,20 VAC, same that U1 PIN1. in bypass, U1 PIN IS 0,985VAC (same than U2 pin4)

April 01, 2023, 09:20:40 AM
Reply #20

JPK

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1117
  • Karma: +37/-0
    • View Profile
Something is pulling down the output of U1-pin1.
Look for a solder bridge on J2, J5, RLY1, RLY2.
Check that the relays are inserted in the correct direction.
JPK

April 01, 2023, 11:26:09 AM
Reply #21

PACO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
I have checked visually the right orientation of RL1 and RL2

Also checked the joints of J2 and J5.

Checking with DMM, none of the pins has to have continuity, right?

April 01, 2023, 06:55:27 PM
Reply #22

JPK

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1117
  • Karma: +37/-0
    • View Profile
No continuity except pins 3-4 on J5 which are connected.
JPK

April 01, 2023, 07:46:44 PM
Reply #23

PACO

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
I detect continuity between pins 8, 10 and 12.

Should I desolder with care and solder again?

April 04, 2023, 12:27:14 PM
Reply #24

JPK

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1117
  • Karma: +37/-0
    • View Profile
This is normal, sorry.
J5 pins 8, 10, 12, 14 are connected to ground.
JPK